skip to primary navigationskip to content

David A. Clark has published an article on “Valuing and Revaluing Education” in a special issue of Comparative Education focusing on “Measuring the Unmeasurable in Education’”

last modified Feb 13, 2017 10:19 AM

Dr Clark used primary data to re-evaluate the relevant dimensions of education for measurement purposes by comparing detailed lists of educational capabilities from disparate academic literatures with the values and aspirations of ordinary South Africans from rural and urban areas. His main finding is that most abstract lists need to say more about the practical side of education (skills, information and knowledge for everyday living). They also need to embrace a more joined-up view of education that can incorporate linkages between different aspects of education and between education and other aspects of well-being (including mental states and material things). In the final part of the paper Dr Clark makes the case for embracing the complexity and imprecision involved in measuring education and briefly sketches a methodological framework that can achieve this end.

Citation

Clark, D. A. (2017), ‘Valuing and Revaluing Education: What Can We Learn About Measurement from the South African Poor?’, Comparative Education, 53 (1), pp. 54–80.

Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03050068.2017.1254954

"It has been almost two years since the murder of Giulio Regeni in Cairo. As we approach this anniversary, we are no nearer to knowing the truth of what happened to this promising post-graduate, tortured and killed while pursuing wholly legitimate academic research... It has been especially troubling to note that, in the absence of apparent progress in investigations into Giulio’s death, attention has been turned to his doctoral supervisor, Dr Maha Abdelrahman – an honourable and distinguished scholar..." Stephen J Toope, Vice-Chancellor. To read the message in full, please go to our News page. The message can also be found on the University of Cambridge homepage.

We are delighted and proud to see that the Centre has gone from no.8 (2015) to no.6 (2016) to no.4 (2017) in the field of Development Studies in the QS Survey. This would not have been possible without the dedication and hard work from everyone within the Centre.